Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Justine
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-16T09:02:00Z
dc.date.available2017-10-16T09:02:00Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationGray, K., Evans, S. C., Griffiths, A. & Schneider, J. (2017). Critical reflections on methodological challenge in arts and dementia evaluation and research. Dementia, 17 (6), pp. 775-784.en
dc.identifier.other10.1177/1471301217734478
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.nottinghamshirehealthcare.nhs.uk/handle/123456789/2264
dc.descriptionArticle as accepted for publication in Dementia published by SAGE Publications available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1471301217734478
dc.description.abstractMethodological rigour, or its absence, is often a focus of concern for the emerging field of evaluation and research around arts and dementia. However, this paper suggests that critical attention should also be paid to the way in which individual perceptions, hidden assumptions and underlying social and political structures influence methodological work in the field. Such attention will be particularly important for addressing methodological challenges relating to contextual variability, ethics, value judgement and signification identified through a literature review on this topic. Understanding how, where and when evaluators and researchers experience such challenges may help to identify fruitful approaches for future evaluation.en
dc.description.urihttp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1471301217734478
dc.formatFull text uploaded
dc.subjectDementiaen
dc.subjectResearch designen
dc.titleCritical reflections on methodological challenge in arts and dementia evaluation and researchen
dc.typeArticle


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record