Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMartin, Jennifer L.
dc.contributor.authorOrrell, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-12T15:43:12Z
dc.date.available2019-08-12T15:43:12Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationChristie, H. L., Martin, J. L., Connor, J., Tange, H. J., Verhey, F. R. J., de Vugt, M. E. & Orrell, M. (2019). eHealth interventions to support caregivers of people with dementia may be proven effective, but are they implementation-ready? Internet Interventions, DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2019.100260en
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.invent.2019.100260
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.nottinghamshirehealthcare.nhs.uk/handle/123456789/3296
dc.description.abstractObjectives: A variety of health services delivered via the Internet, or "eHealth interventions," to support caregivers of people with dementia have shown evidence of effectiveness, but only a small number are put into practice. This study aimed to investigate whether, how and why their implementation took place. <br/>Method(s): This qualitative study followed up on the 12 publications included in Boots et al.'s (2014) widely cited systematic review on eHealth interventions for informal caregivers of people with dementia, in order to explore further implementation into practice. Publicly available online information, implementation readiness (ImpRess checklist scores), and survey responses were assessed. <br/>Finding(s): Two interventions were freely available online, two were available in a trial context, and one was exclusively available to clinical staff previously involved in the research project. The remaining seven were unavailable. All scores on the ImpRess checklist were at 50% or lower of the total, indicating that the interventions were not ready to implement at the time of the Boots et al. (2014) review, though some interventions were scored as more implementation-ready in subsequent follow-up publications. Responses to the survey were received from six out of twelve authors. Key learnings from the survey included the importance of the involvement of stakeholders at all stages of the process, as well as the flexible adaptation and commercialization of the intervention. <br/>Conclusion(s): In general, low levels of implementation readiness were reported and often the information necessary to assess implementation readiness was unavailable. The only two freely available interventions had long-term funding from aging foundations. Authors pointed to the involvement of financial gatekeepers in the development process and the creation of a business model early on as important facilitators to implementation. Future research should focus on the factors enabling sustainable implementation.<br/>Copyright &#xa9; 2019 The Authorsen
dc.description.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214782919300090en
dc.subjectCarersen
dc.subjectDementiaen
dc.subjectTelemedicineen
dc.subjectInterneten
dc.subjectAgingen
dc.subjectChecklisten
dc.titleeHealth interventions to support caregivers of people with dementia may be proven effective, but are they implementation-ready?en
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record