Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYates, Jennifer A.
dc.contributor.authorStanyon, Miriam R.
dc.contributor.authorChallis, David
dc.contributor.authorColeston-Shields, Donna M.
dc.contributor.authorDening, Tom
dc.contributor.authorJawahar, Kaanthan
dc.contributor.authorStreater, Amy
dc.contributor.authorOrrell, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-27T10:10:41Z
dc.date.available2020-10-27T10:10:41Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationYates, J. A., Stanyon, M. R., Challis, D., Coleston-Shields, D. M., Dening, T., Hoe, J., Jawahar, K., Lloyd-Evans, B., Moniz-Cook, E., Poland, F., et al. (2020). Developing a model of best practice for teams managing crisis in people with dementia: a consensus approach. BMC Psychiatry, 20 (1), pp.505.en
dc.identifier.other10.1186/s12888-020-02899-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.nottinghamshirehealthcare.nhs.uk/handle/123456789/3557
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUNDTeams delivering crisis resolution services for people with dementia and their carers provide short-term interventions to prevent admission to acute care settings. There is great variation in these services across the UK. This article reports on a consensus process undertaken to devise a Best Practice Model and evaluation Tool for use with teams managing crisis in dementia.METHODSThe Best Practice Model and Tool were developed over a three stage process: (i) Evidence gathering and generation of candidate standards (systematic review and scoping survey, interviews and focus groups); (ii) Prioritisation and selection of standards (consultation groups, a consensus conference and modified Delphi process); (iii) Refining and operationalising standards (consultation group and field-testing).RESULTSOne hundred sixty-five candidate standards arose from the evidence gathering stage; were refined and reduced to 90 through a consultation group exercise; and then reduced to 50 during the consensus conference and weighted using a modified Delphi process. Standards were then operationalised through a clinical consultation group and field-tested with 11 crisis teams and 5 non-crisis teams. Scores ranged from 48 to 92/100. The median score for the crisis teams was 74.5 (range 67-92), and the median score for non-crisis teams was 60 (range 48-72).CONCLUSIONSWith further psychometric testing, this Best Practice Model and Tool will be ideal for the planning, improvement and national benchmarking of teams managing dementia crises in the future.en
dc.description.urihttps://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-020-02899-0en
dc.subjectDementiaen
dc.subjectCrisis interventionen
dc.subjectCarersen
dc.titleDeveloping a model of best practice for teams managing crisis in people with dementia: a consensus approachen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record